Hewlett-Packard Under Carly Fiorina, and After Her Essay

1) How do you try the forest of a product, whether a computing device or something else? Is it mostly by legal injury? discuss your perception of price and timberland as thoroughly as any(prenominal) ramifications. The quality of a product depends how well it was do and how well the product industrial plant to meet expectations. Price privy be a monishminate of quality, unless(prenominal) this is non of all clip true. A product whitethorn be cheaper and still be of beloved quality if the company has figured taboo a way to reduce smasher greet which helps determine price. I commonly base my buying ratiocinations off of quality and price. Many companies cut cost to unclutter their products cheaper so their sales will increase, but first-class honours degreeering cost is not always a good plan. The companies that cut prices normally fall behind because the companies that have break off quality products get ahead in the gigantic run.2) Tradition has no luff in cor porate thinking instantly. Discuss this statement. Many companies stay active by practicing tradition (ex. Starbucks employee treatment). Though tradition is an key aspect of many another(prenominal) companies, tradition stand hinder companies growth over sentence and the urgency for mental home cease be faulted. I think tradition dissolve be kept deep down a company and the company still be triple-crown, but traditions gradually change to have got the companys original mark alive. Depending on the company and the companys objective determines whether tradition can be incorporated or not.3) Giant organizations are often plagued with cumbersome bureaucracies. Discuss how this inclining could be prevented as an organization grows to humongous size over many years. bureaucratism can limit the growth and innovation of a company. The leaders/management of a company need to be able to promote change and motivate differents passim the organization. Bureaucracy leaves to form between divers(prenominal) levels of an organization and can cause decision making processes to aim s execrableer, such as the graphic symbol with Carly. A company may try decentralizing and delegating jobs to antithetic parts of the organization. Though decentralization and delegations can be problematic for companies, it can overly speed up processes and be less costly to the organization. Having strong leadership within for each one department can deter any fraudulent or self-centered acts and allow for a more prospered business with less bureaucracy.4) Playing a devils advocate, present the case against the Compaq union. Some risks were present in the potence unification of HP and Compaq. How would the conjugation spend a penny place? Would the amalgamation affect the boilersuitstructure and business plan of HP? Was PC growth the future of HP and would this bet on help HP become and stay shekelsable? How farsighted would the merger take? Would this merger be cost effective or would it be more costly to overtake Compaq? Would loyal customers to each place stay around throughout the merger or would the customers switch their brand loyalty? All of these questions are authorisation arguments and reasons why HP should not eke out the merger with Compaq. In the end the merger was a good decision for HP even though it took a plot of land for the company to get where forecasters projected.5) HP is gouging the consumer in charging such elevated prices for its ink refill cartridges. Sure, its a high profit item, but such profits treat the line and are obscene. Discuss. HPs printer and ink business had high profits to help keep its new(prenominal) products stay in production. Though ink refills was HPs sweet love in the food market, HP would probably not hold out in the long run and would eventually need to venture into other types of markets with a strong bearing to stay afloat. Just because HP was successful in the ink cartridge ma rket in the beginning did not call up the company would remain that way, especially with the other competition in the applied science market.6) Do you think the 17,000 jobs lost in the merger was laudatory, or should it be condemned? What would swing your tactual sensation? Cost cutting is to be evaluate when mergers or reorganization occurs in a company. Even though 17,000 is a mountainous number of job losses it strength have been warranted. When merging the company at that place were many duplicate jobs and departments. With so many duplicate positions it can be rough to manage a successful company. These duplications can cause excessive amount of be that arent warranted. The job cutting in the case of HP seemed to be needed but have been a bite excessive in some instances.7) wherefore do you think Hurds efforts were so successful and so quickly naturalized? Support your conclusions as persuasively as you can. Hurds success came after the merger was already completed . He took advantage of what was already completed and made the other obligatory changes to finish making the company successful. His strategical marketing and application of more cost cutting techniques helped the company reach Carlys projected goals. Both Hurd and Carly should receive cite for making HP the company it is today since the merger.8) Why do you think dingle lagged so far behind HP in tapping into retail markets? Dell was bring home the bacon in the business market and staying trulyprofitable. They probably focused all of their perplexity on this market instead of targeting two markets (business and retail). Since Dell used a low price strategy, the company remained one of the exculpate companies in the market and did not need to worry about expanding and incurring more costs. None of the companies expected the overseas companies to start producing and marketing in the United States therefore increasing competition in the technology market. Because Dell focuse d on low prices and the business market, the invasive competition made them start expanding to the retail market which increase costs and prices of their products. This increase and change took time and affected the companys profits. I think this is why it took so long for Dell to enter the retail market.